Strengthening Juvenile Justice Systems in the counter-terrorism context

Community of practice

Resources

Inhuman and Unnecessary: Human Rights Violations in Dutch High-Security Prisons in the Context of Counterterrorism

NL Netherlands
Report
Year: 
2017
Publisher: 
Open Society Justice Initiative

In the Netherlands, individuals who are suspected or convicted on terrorism charges are held in two special high-security detention units, known as terroristenafdeling, or TA.

In these facilities, people suspected of even nonviolent offenses are subject to the same extreme levels of control as those who have been convicted. That includes extensive daily confinement in their cells and intrusive body searches, whether or not the individual in question poses a genuine threat.

This report, Inhuman and Unnecessary: Human Rights Violations in Dutch High-Security Prisons in the Context of Counterterrorism, by researchers from the Open Society Justice Initiative and Amnesty International Netherlands, reveals the fundamental flaws in the TA system. It draws on scores of interviews with former detainees, prison officials, and others in the Netherlands’ justice system. It calls for urgent changes to ensure that a system designed to protect the citizens of the Netherlands does not do so at the expense of human rights.

X v. Germany (application no. 54646/17), European Court of Human Rights, 2017

EU European Union
Case law
Year: 
2017
Publisher: 
European Court of Human Rights

In its decision in the case of X v. Germany (application no. 54646/17) the European Court of Human Rights has unanimously declared the application inadmissible. The decision is final.

Like the domestic courts, the European Court concluded that there were no substantial grounds for believing that the applicant, if deported to Moscow, would be exposed to a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 (prohibition of torture and of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights as he had no connection with the conflicts in the Northern Caucasus. In particular, the Court saw no reason to depart from the domestic courts’ decisions, which had carefully weighed all the evidence and had made a comprehensive assessment of the applicant’s case.

Children and violent extremism: international standards and responses from criminal justice systems

unknown World Wide
Briefing
Year: 
2017
Publisher: 
PRI

This briefing gives an overview of what the international and regional standards say regarding the care and treatment of children who are suspected, or convicted, of violent extremist related offences.

It also looks at some examples of state responses and civil society interventions. It touches upon issues of preventing children’s involvement in violent extremism but is primarily focused on the criminal justice and penal response to children who are in conflict with the law owing to involvement in such activity.

Key points of the briefing were translated into AlbanianBCS (Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian) and Macedonian for the 2017 US Department of Justice’s Symposium on Efforts to Address Prison Radicalization in the Balkans.

Correcting the Course: Advancing Juvenile Justice Principles for Children Convicted of Violent Extremist Offenses

unknown World Wide
Report
Year: 
2017
Publisher: 
Global Center on Cooperative Security and International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague

Children have always been among the most vulnerable victims of violence and, at times, some of its brutal purveyors. They have played various roles in furthering violent extremism and participating in acts of violence, ranging from inciting propaganda online to carrying out deadly attacks. Rather than exceptionalizing these children, their treatment under the criminal justice system should be grounded in juvenile justice standards.

To advance the work of the Global Counterterrorism Forum (GCTF), the government of Australia commissioned the Global Center and the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) to prepare a report and accompanying policy brief putting forward guiding principles, recommendations, and considerations for the detention, rehabilitation, and reintegration of juveniles convicted of terrorism and violent extremism offenses. Together, they advance a juvenile justice approach for authorities responsible for their care and support the notion that national security interests and juvenile justice imperatives are compatible and mutually reinforcing in preventing and countering violent extremism.

Responding to a call from the GCTF Neuchâtel Memorandum on Good Practices for Juvenile Justice in a Counterterrorism Context to collect and collate information on children engaged in terrorism-related activity, the report takes stock of theory, policies, and practice globally. The recommendations draw from international juvenile justice standards, the emerging body of principles and practices in the detention of adult violent extremist offenders, and the national experiences in demobilizing and reintegrating child combatants and members of organized criminal groups.

The report elaborates on the Policy Brief that was formally adopted by the GCTF in December 2016. The policy brief was adapted for publication in EuroVista’s Probation and Community Justice Journal, available at http://euro-vista.org/.

The effects of terrorism and counter-terrorism measures on the enjoyment of children’s rights

unknown World Wide
Article
Year: 
2016
Publisher: 
Child Rights International Network

With terrorist acts making the news almost every day, the threat of terrorism and the means to fight it are becoming a key concern for policy makers, law enforcement agencies and the population at large. Governments have a responsibility to protect those within their jurisdiction from terrorist attacks. However, any attempt to counter terrorism raises the question of its compatibility with international human rights law and standards. Often, government responses to fear of terrorism and radicalisation result in excessive measures that infringe human rights, be it through a vague or overbroad definition of terrorist acts or by granting excessive powers to law enforcement agencies. The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 31/30, recalls that “the objectives of countering terrorism and of the protection and promotion of human rights are not conflicting but complementary and mutually reinforcing”.

Terrorism has devastating consequences on civilians, often directly impacting the enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms. But the impact of terrorism and counter-terrorism measures on children are heightened on account of their age and the fact that they are simultaneously left out of the debates around preventing terrorism and radicalisation.  

This submission was made in response to the call for input for OHCHR's report on terrorism and human rights.

The effects of terrorism and counter-terrorism measures on the enjoyment of children’s rights

unknown World Wide
Report
Year: 
2016
Publisher: 
CRIN

With terrorist acts making the news almost every day, the threat of terrorism and the means to fight it are becoming a key concern for policy makers, law enforcement agencies and the population at large. Governments have a responsibility to protect those within their jurisdiction from terrorist attacks. However, any attempt to counter terrorism raises the question of its compatibility with international human rights law and standards. Often, government responses to fear of terrorism and radicalisation result in excessive measures that infringe human rights, be it through a vague or overbroad definition of terrorist acts or by granting excessive powers to law enforcement agencies. The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 31/30, recalls that “the objectives of countering terrorism and of the protection and promotion of human rights are not conflicting but complementary and mutually reinforcing”.

Terrorism has devastating consequences on civilians, often directly impacting the enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms. But the impact of terrorism and counter-terrorism measures on children are heightened on account of their age and the fact that they are simultaneously left out of the debates around preventing terrorism and radicalisation.  

This submission was made in response to the call for input for OHCHR's report on terrorism and human rights.

Council of Europe Handbook for Prison and Probation Services regarding Radicalisation and Violent Extremism

EU European Union
Handbook
Year: 
2016
Publisher: 
Council of Europe

The Guidelines are intended to provide a general legal and ethical framework for devising appropriate policies and responses which conform to the Council of Europe standards and principles related to the rule of law and protection of human rights. They uphold the importance of investing in good prison and probation management and the need to train staff to high professional and ethical standards in order to effectively counter radicalisation leading to violent extremism. They also emphasise that prison and probation work should be seen as part of a comprehensive multi-agency strategy to combat violent extremism.

Child returnees from conflict zones

unknown World Wide
Paper
Year: 
2016
Publisher: 
Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN)

This paper looks at ways to respond – from a practitioner's perspective - to the situation of children returning to Europe having either been born or travelled to Daesh held territories in Syria/Iraq as well as non-European children travelling from Daesh territory to Europe as a result of forced displacement.